BCSCR Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 10, 2014

BUILDING COMMNUNITIES THAT SUPPORT CHILDREN’S READING
New Federal Project Provides Opportunities to Raise Literacy

During the next two years, more than 70,000 children in 84 school districts across 4 states will improve their reading proficiency.

The project, Building Communities that Support Children’s Reading, or BCSCR, will implement a multi-pronged approach that affects schools, communities, parents, and children in high-poverty districts in New Mexico, eastern Arizona, southern Colorado, and El Paso, Texas.

Funded by a 2-year $10.8 million federal award, BCSCR will provide professional development and reading resources to schools, as well as family reading events and free books in high-poverty neighborhoods. Students struggling with reading will have the opportunity to receive free tutoring.

The Three Rivers Education Foundation, recipient of the project funding, has been seeking such an opportunity to make a broad-scale impact on student reading. David Bowman, executive director, notes, “For years, we have infused schools with high-quality teachers and administrators, but now we can address the entire learning environment of homes, communities, and schools. Our focus is, and always has been, improving student learning.”

This is a big project with big expectations. By increasing families’ access to books and reading activities, working with teachers, and offering tutoring, the foundation staff expects to see significant increases in the percentage of students who meet proficiency levels on state achievement tests.

Through BCSCR, the foundation will place regional coordinators in education centers throughout the four states, who will collaborate with districts and community organizations to address their unique needs and oversee local tutors.

The foundation is in full gear getting the project up and running. Bowman explains, “At this time, our biggest push is finding exceptional people to serve as those regional coordinators. We know they are out there. Our partnerships with the education centers will be key to this effort.”

The foundation expects that the project will be fully staffed and operational by January 2015, with school and community services beginning once students return to school after their winter break.

 

###

 

The Three Rivers Education Foundation is a 501(c)(3) New Mexico non-profit organization that collaborates with school districts and institutions of higher education to meet students’ needs for high quality educators and powerful learning opportunities. With former state, district, and school leaders as members and supporters, the Foundation leads a variety of important education projects and initiatives. More information about the foundation is available online at http://threeriverseducationfoundation.org or by calling 505-436-2548.

Posted in Uncategorized.

Academic English and Achievement

Comparative Study of Teachers’ Academic English Use and Students’ Academic Achievement Rates

The Three Rivers Education Foundation is seeking funding to research the relationship between teachers’ modeling and reinforcement of academic English and students’ academic achievement.

Rationale

New Mexico has many students classified as English Language Learners (ELLs) who use English as their primary language. They were born into households that speak predominately English, they communicate with their peer using English, they hear and use English in their communities, and yet they are considered ELLs. They are, for all practical purposes, native English speakers.

Achievement scores for these students are abysmal. They perform poorly on standardized achievement tests, even though they may be successful in the classroom environment, meaning they pass their classes, advance to the next grade, and graduate from high school. One possible explanation is that the achievement requirements of the classroom are lower than the requirements for demonstrating proficiency on standardized tests. This issue has been repeatedly explored in education research.

Another possible explanation is that students don’t have the language skills necessary to understand the language on achievement tests or the ability to communicate successfully in an academic context. If this is the case, these ELL students are more appropriately classified as Academic English Learners (AELs), an education classification that does not yet exist because a general responsibility for educators  is to help students develop academic English skills. In other words, helping students achieve academic English proficiency is not the function of specialists (as with special education teachers and reading intervention specialists) but is the function of all teachers as a part of their basic responsibilities.

Academic English is formal, standard English. Academic English is characterized by

  • adherence to grammar rules
  • use of specific and subject-related terminology
  • absence of slang

Academic English is the language used in text books, in other instructional resources, and on assessments for academic proficiency.

We are making the assumption that students who do not understand academic English cannot fully access information in instructional materials (e.g., text books) and cannot fully understand the content of proficiency tests. The result is that students do not learn what they are expected to know and are unable to demonstrate what they have learned. In brief, they don’t speak the language of the instructional materials, and they don’t speak the language they encounter on standardized assessments.

As an analogy, consider a 14-year-old student who has just immigrated to the U.S. from China and whose primary language is Mandarin. Since arriving in the U.S., the student has been learning English but still struggles to communicate in English, the target language. At school, the student receives text books in English and is expected to take achievement tests written in English. Although this student may have some English speaking skills, those skills are insufficient to understand much of content in the text book and assessments. In this case, the student cannot be expected to perform well in school because the student does not have sufficient skills in the target language. This is identical to the challenges students face when they do not speak and do not understand formal, academic English.

The target language for AELs is academic English. As with any language, the ability to speak academic English depends on three things:

  • Exposure to the target language (i.e., hearing and seeing examples),
  • Direct instruction in the target language, and
  • Reinforcement of the target language (i.e., correction of incorrect use, benefits for correct use).

Through this study, therefore, we will examine the degree to which students are exposed to, receive instruction in, and are held accountable for the use of academic English in education environments, and we seek to understand the how the degree of exposure, instruction, and reinforcement corresponds to students’ academic proficiency as measured by standardized proficiency assessments.

Study Methodology Summary

  1. Determine indicators of academic English (e.g., grammatically correct and complete sentences, specific subject-related terminology, absence of slang).
  2. Identify 20 education pipelines, no more than 2 per school district: 10 with high rates of academic failure among primary-English speaking students and 10 with high rates of academic success among primary-English speaking students.
  3. Conduct 2 1-hour audio recordings per teacher per grade level and transcribe the recordings.
  4. Analyze the transcripts for examples of non-academic English by teachers and by students. Determine the percentage of total teacher speech and total student speech representing non-academic English.
  5. Analyze the transcripts for examples of correction by the teacher when students use non-academic English. Determine the percentage of non-corrected examples of students’ non-academic English use.
  6. Collect a sample of teacher-graded student writing artifacts.
  7. Analyze the writing artifacts for the use of non-academic English and the rate of teacher correction.
  8. Compare rates of student and teacher academic English use between high and low performing education pipelines.
  9. Compare rates of teachers’ correction of students’ non-academic English use between high and low performing education pipelines
  10. Compare rates of non-academic English use on written artifacts between high and low performing education pipelines.
  11. Compare rates of teachers’ correction of non-academic English use on written artifacts between high and low performing education pipelines.

Definitions

  • Education pipeline: A high school plus a feeder middle and elementary school.
  • Primary English-speaking student: A student who uses English to communicate with parents and in social settings with peers.
  • Low rates of academic achievement: Less than 40% of students are demonstrating grade level proficiency in English, Mathematics, and Science on standardized assessments.
  • High rates of academic achievement: More than 60% of students are demonstrating grade level proficiency in English, Mathematics, and Science on standardized assessments.

Hypotheses

Hypothesis 1: Teachers in education pipelines with low performing students use non-academic English for a higher percentage of total speech than the teachers in education pipelines of high performing students.   

Hypothesis 2: Teachers in education pipelines with low performing students are less likely to correct students’ non-academic English than the teachers in education pipelines with high performing students. 

Hypothesis 3: Low achieving students have a lower rate of spoken and written academic English use than higher achieving students. 

Caveat

This methodology purposely does not take into account students’ socio-academic status. Although more affluent students tend to meet grade-level expectations at a higher rate than poor students, English usage is a learned skill and is not caused by financial resources. This study, therefore, looks at the process by which students learn academic English skills, particularly the influence of the classroom experience on the development of those skills.

Budget

The budget for this study will include the following components.

  • Lead researcher
  • Secondary researcher
  • Statistician
  • Transcription services
  • Publications and promotions
  • Travel to school sites
Posted in Uncategorized.

Skandera on the Common Core Standards

On September 11, 2013, Education Secretary Skandera discussed the state of education in New Mexico and the Common Core Standards initiative.

Her staff provided 3 handouts about the Common Core standards, which are posted here for your information and use. (All linked files are PDFs and open in new windows.)

Why the Common Core in New Mexico?
Presentation on the Common Core and rationale for its use in New Mexico

Common Core and PARCC Talking Points
1-page listing of the “talking points” on the standards, the process, and professional development

Fact Sheet-Common Misunderstandings CCSS
Various criticisms about the Common Core and the Public Education Department’s responses

Posted in Uncategorized.

Native Americans Struggle Most with Teacher Licensure Exams

Native Americans fail four components of the NM Teacher Licensure exams at a higher rate than Caucasian, Hispanic, Black, and Other ethnicities, based on an analysis of test results for 659 teacher candidates who have participated in the Three Rivers Transition to Teaching (T2T) program since 2008.

Overview of Report

 The analysis includes results from the teacher licensure tests for

  • Basic Skills,
  • Teacher Competencies-Elementary,
  • Teacher Competency-Secondary, and
  • Content Knowledge-Elementary.

Although the Foundation office has results for other sub tests, none have sufficient numbers of testers to suggest that the results may be either reliable or generalizable.

Based on test results included in this analysis, a higher percentage of Native American testers fail licensure tests than members of any other ethnic group. Overall, the difference between the percentage of tests failed by Native Americans and the percentage of the testing population represented by Native Americans is greater than among any other ethnic minority group. These results are explained in greater details below.

The data and per-test results are not publicly available at this time. We are establishing plans to study the nature of this problem and strategies for informing program and/or policy changes.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized.

Enrollment Data Show Early Dropout Patterns

Does NM have a drop-out problem?
Yes.

Is the drop-out problem most pronounced in grades 9 – 12?
Yes.

Is the drop-out problem limited to the upper grades?
No.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized.